Williams v. Price et al

Filing 55

ORDER ADOPTING 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER DENYING 44 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/8/2019. Answer to Complaint due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COREY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 1:18-cv-00102-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

14

BRANDON PRICE, et al.,

(ECF Nos. 44, 45, 46, 48, 49)

15

Defendants.

TWENTY DAY DEADLINE

16
17

Plaintiff Corey Williams, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this

18

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Brandon Price and Pam Ahlin filed

19

a motion to dismiss that was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

20

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On March 14, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (F&Rs)

22

recommending denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 49. The F&Rs were served on

23

the parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were

24

to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service. The period for filing objections has

25

passed and no objections have been filed.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has

27

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court

28

finds the F&Rs to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1
2

1.

The findings and recommendations, filed March 14, 2019, ECF No. 49, are
ADOPTED IN FULL;

3
4

2.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED;

5

3.

Defendants shall file an answer to the second amended complaint within twenty
(20) days of the date of entry of this order; and

6
7

4.

This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

May 8, 2019

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2