Burruel v. Ahlin et al

Filing 10

ORDER relating cases and reassigning action to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/26/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL BURRUEL, III, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:18-cv-00103-SAB (PC) New Case No. 1:18-cv-00103-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. SENG v. PAM AHLIN, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On January 22, 2018, Plaintiff Manuel Burruel, III filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging emergency amendments to Cal. Code Regs. tit. 9, § 4350 as violating the U.S. Constitution. (ECF No. 1.) Upon review of this case, the Court finds that it is related under Local Rule 123 to the action entitled Rainwater v. Allen, 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS. Both actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and fact. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS; 2. This case shall be assigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill 26 27 and reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; and 3. The new case number shall be: 28 1 1: 18-cv-00103-LJO-SAB (PC) 1 2 and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are 3 advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of 4 documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed and received by 5 the appropriate judicial officer. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ February 26, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?