Burruel v. Ahlin et al
Filing
10
ORDER relating cases and reassigning action to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/26/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MANUEL BURRUEL, III,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
Case No. 1:18-cv-00103-SAB (PC)
New Case No. 1:18-cv-00103-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER RELATING CASES AND
REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT
JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL AND
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. SENG
v.
PAM AHLIN, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
On January 22, 2018, Plaintiff Manuel Burruel, III filed this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging emergency amendments to Cal. Code Regs. tit. 9, § 4350 as
violating the U.S. Constitution. (ECF No. 1.) Upon review of this case, the Court finds that it is
related under Local Rule 123 to the action entitled Rainwater v. Allen, 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS.
Both actions are based on the same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law
and fact.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS;
2.
This case shall be assigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill
26
27
and reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; and
3.
The new case number shall be:
28
1
1: 18-cv-00103-LJO-SAB (PC)
1
2
and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are
3
advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of
4
documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed and received by
5
the appropriate judicial officer.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
February 26, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?