Nicklas v. Kokor et al

Filing 45

ORDER Following Initial Scheduling Conference; ORDER DENYING 29 , 30 & 43 Motions to Appoint Counsel; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 43 Request for a Case Status Report; and ORDER DENYING 33 Request for Conference Statements in Transcript signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/19/2019. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEVE ROCKY NICKLAS,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:18-cv-00119-LJO-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.
W. KOKOR and MS. MATA,

15

(ECF NOS. 29, 30, 33, & 43)

Defendants.

16
17

Steve Rocky Nicklas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 18, 2019, the Court

19

held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his

20

own behalf. Counsel Derrek Lee telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants.

21

For the reasons stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s further compliance1 with the initial disclosures requirement (ECF No.

22

19) is waived.

23

2. Plaintiff’s requests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 29, 30, & 43) are

24
25

denied without prejudice.

26

3. Plaintiff’s request for a case status report (ECF No. 43) is denied as moot.

27
28

1

Plaintiff disclosed witnesses and documents on the record at the Conference.
1

4. Plaintiff’s request for conference statements in transcript (ECF No. 33) is

1
2

denied.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 19, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2