Thompson v. Gomez et al

Filing 101

ORDER Regarding Parties Consent to, Decline to, or Withhold Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Within Fourteen Days, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 04/21/2022. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK SHANE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:18-cv-00125-JLT-SAB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PARTIES CONSENT TO, DECLINE TO, OR WITHHOLD CONSENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS v. A. GOMEZ, et. al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter is currently ready to proceed to jury trial on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim 18 against Defendants Gomez, Weiss, Sazo, and Gray, and on Plaintiff’s related failure to 19 intervene claim against Defendants Johnson and Busby, all of which arise from a takedown 20 incident that took place on May 30, 2017. 21 Neither party has filed a consent or decline to magistrate judge jurisdiction. 22 The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District 23 Judge caseload in the entire nation. Though the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this 24 case in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that their needs and expectations may not 25 be met as expeditiously as desired. 26 District Judges are now setting multiple trials to begin upon the same date, and as a result 27 parties may find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires the 28 Court give any criminal case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the Court must 1 1 proceed with criminal trials even if a civil trial is older or was set earlier. Continuances of civil 2 trials under these circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated 3 finding of good cause. If multiple trials are scheduled to begin on the same day, this civil trial 4 will trail day-to-day or week-to-week until completion of any criminal case or older civil case. 5 The parties are advised of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct 6 all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to rule upon 7 dispositive motions and conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 8 § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. The magistrate judges of this 9 District are well-qualified and experienced and will set the matter for trial quickly. 10 The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to provide the parties with the Court’s 11 standard form to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Within 14 days of this 12 order’s date of service, the parties shall either consent to or decline Magistrate Judge 13 jurisdiction by filling out the requisite forms and returning them to the Court. 14 The parties are advised that they are free to decline or withhold consent without any 15 adverse substantive consequences. The Court also does not take any position on the merits of 16 any claim or defense in this case by issuing this order. Accordingly, 17 1. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send to the parties a copy of the 18 consent/decline form and the instructions for consenting to or declining Magistrate Judge 19 jurisdiction. 20 2. Within 14 days from the date of service of this order, the parties SHALL 21 complete and return the consent/decline form. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2022 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?