Thompson v. Gomez et al

Filing 116

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Trial Date within Ten Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/2/2022. (Case Management Deadline: 10-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK SHANE THOMPSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. A. GOMEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00125-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TRIAL DATE WITHIN TEN DAYS (ECF No. 115) Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This action is proceeding against Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Gomez, 20 Weiss, Sazo, and Gray, and on Plaintiff’s related failure to intervene claim against Defendants Johnson and 21 Busby, arising from a takedown incident that took place on May 30, 2017. 22 The case is set for jury trial on October 17, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. 23 On July 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend the trial date for six months to a year in 24 order for his to locate witnesses and obtain any necessary documentation. (ECF No. 115) 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Although the Court is not inclined to grant Plaintiff’s request to extend the jury trial date 2 because of the length of time this case has been pending, the Court HEREBY DIRECTS Defendants to 3 file a response within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 August 2, 2022 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?