Thompson v. Gomez et al

Filing 129

ORDER REGARDING Defendants' Objections to the Pretrial Order and Amendment to Pretrial Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/14/2022. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

MARK SHANE THOMPSON,

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS TO THE PRETRIAL ORDER
AND AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL
ORDER

Plaintiff,

7
v.

8
9

Case No. 1:18-cv-00125-SAB (PC)

A. GOMEZ, et al.,
(ECF No. 128)
Defendants.

10
11

Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

12

13 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
14

On September 7, 2022, the Court issued the pretrial order in this action. (ECF No. 125.)

15

On September 13, 2022, Defendants filed objections to the pretrial order. (ECF No. 128.)

16

Defendants seek to clarify that they do not intend to call correctional officer Adrien

17 Smith-Walker at trial because the witness is not available. Defendants also seek to clarify that
18 they are not required to file the proposed exhibits with the Court. Defendants’ objections are
19 sustained.
On the basis of good cause, the Court’s September 7, 2022, pretrial order is AMENDED

20

21 to reflect that correctional officer Adrien Smith-Walker is omitted from the list of Defendants’
22 proposed witnesses, and the parties are not required to file the proposed exhibits with the Court.
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated:

September 14, 2022
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1