Thompson v. Gomez et al
Filing
21
AMENDED ORDER to Show Cause why Defendant Rodriguez Should not be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(M) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/25/2018. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK SHANE THOMPSON,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
A. GOMEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00125-LJO-SAB (PC)
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT RODRIGUEZ SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M)
[ECF No. 19]
Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants A. Gomez, E. Weiss, Y.
Sazo, C. Gray, J. Busby, Rodriguez, and J. Doe Nos 1 and 2 for excessive force.
21
The United States Marshal was not able to locate or identify Defendant Rodriguez, and service
22
was returned un-executed on April 30, 2018. The following information was provided by the Marshal
23
in the remarks of the unexecuted summons: “The CDC is unable to identify a Rodriguez working at
24
the facility during the time specified.” (ECF No. 16.)
25
On May 8, 2018, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why Defendant
26
Rodriguez should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
27
(ECF No. 17.) On May 24, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff thirty additional days to provide
28
additional information for service on Defendant Rodriguez. (ECF No. 20.)
1
On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to “show proof that Phantom
1
2
Defendants Romero, Swanson, and M. Pomoa exist within Plaintiff’s complaint.” (ECF No. 19.)
Due to an administrative error, the Court’s May 8, 2018 order is HEREBY AMENDED to
3
4
delete any and all reference to Defendants Romero, Swanson, and M. Pomoa as it relates to only
5
Defendant Rodriguez.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
May 25, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?