Thompson v. Gomez et al

Filing 21

AMENDED ORDER to Show Cause why Defendant Rodriguez Should not be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(M) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/25/2018. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK SHANE THOMPSON, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. A. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00125-LJO-SAB (PC) AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT RODRIGUEZ SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M) [ECF No. 19] Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants A. Gomez, E. Weiss, Y. Sazo, C. Gray, J. Busby, Rodriguez, and J. Doe Nos 1 and 2 for excessive force. 21 The United States Marshal was not able to locate or identify Defendant Rodriguez, and service 22 was returned un-executed on April 30, 2018. The following information was provided by the Marshal 23 in the remarks of the unexecuted summons: “The CDC is unable to identify a Rodriguez working at 24 the facility during the time specified.” (ECF No. 16.) 25 On May 8, 2018, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why Defendant 26 Rodriguez should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 27 (ECF No. 17.) On May 24, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff thirty additional days to provide 28 additional information for service on Defendant Rodriguez. (ECF No. 20.) 1 On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to “show proof that Phantom 1 2 Defendants Romero, Swanson, and M. Pomoa exist within Plaintiff’s complaint.” (ECF No. 19.) Due to an administrative error, the Court’s May 8, 2018 order is HEREBY AMENDED to 3 4 delete any and all reference to Defendants Romero, Swanson, and M. Pomoa as it relates to only 5 Defendant Rodriguez. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 May 25, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?