Perez et al v. City Of Fresno et al

Filing 55

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. IT IS ORDERED as follows: Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint submitted concurrently with the stipulation as the operative complaint withi n the meaning of Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The current scheduling order (ECF Nos. 29 & 49 ) is hereby vacated. The parties shall submit a proposed new scheduling order to the Court within one week of an appearance by the newly-named Defendants. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 04/24/2019. (Apodaca, P)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ANOTHONY PEREZ, individually,
CECILIA PEREZ, individually,
TERRALEE PEREZ, individually, and as
successor in interest to Joseph Perez,
JOSEPH PEREZ, JR., individually and as
successor in interest to Joseph Perez, and
X.P. a minor, by and through his Guardian
ad Litem, MICHELLE PEREZ,
individually and as successor in interest to
Joseph Perez

21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
REGARDING PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
(ECF NO. 54)

Plaintiffs,

19
20

Case No. 1:18-cv-00127-AWI-EPG

v.
CITY OF FRESNO, COUNTY OF
FRESNO, JAMES ROSSETTI, an
individual, SEAN CALVERT, an
individual, CHRIS MARTINEZ, an
individual, BRAITHAN STOLTENBERG,
an individual, ROBERT MCEWEN, an
individual, KARLSON MANASAN, an
individual, JIMMY ROBNETT, an
individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive.,
Defendants.

27

Upon consideration of the Parties “Joint Stipulation Regarding Proposed First Amended

28

Complaint for Damages,” (ECF No. 54) and finding good cause therefore for the amendment of
1

1
2

the First Amended Complaint, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint submitted

3

concurrently with the stipulation as the operative complaint within the meaning of

4

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

5

2. The current scheduling order (ECF Nos. 29 & 49) is hereby vacated.

6

3. The parties shall submit a proposed new scheduling order to the Court within one week
of an appearance by the newly-named Defendants.

7
8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 24, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2