Henderson v. Dae Henderson Jr Trust
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to DENY 21 Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration;This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 06/22/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAE HENDERSON, Jr.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 1:18-cv-00143-AWI-SKO HC
Petitioner,
v.
HUNTER ANGLEA, Warden of Sierra
Conservation Center,
Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND
COMPEL ARBITRATION
(Doc. No. 21, 26)
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304.
20
On May 14, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations in which
21
she recommended that the Court deny Petitioner’s motion to stay proceedings and compel
22
arbitration. The Findings and Recommendations, which was served on Petitioner on the same
23
date, provided that objections could be served within thirty days. Although thirty days have
24
passed, no objections have been filed.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), having carefully reviewed
26
the entire file de novo, the Court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by
27
the record and proper analysis.
28
1
1
ORDER
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
4
The Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 26), filed May 14, 2018, are ADOPTED in
full;
5
2.
Petitioner’s motion to stay and compel arbitration (Doc. No. 21) is DENIED; and
6
3.
This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 22, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?