Vertical Tank, Inc. v. BakerCorp

Filing 45

ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELECONFERENCE re Discovery Dispute; ORDER SETTING FURTHER CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/7/2019. Further Discovery Conference set for 6/17/2019 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERTICAL TANK, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BAKERCORP, 15 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00145 LJO LJT ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELECONFERENCE RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE; ORDER SETTING FURTHER CONFERENCE (Doc. 43) Defendant. 16 17 The Court held an informal teleconference with counsel to attempt to resolve disputes over 18 production requests propounded by the plaintiff. (Doc. 44) The conference was not successful, 19 except that plaintiff’s counsel agrees that he received the defendant’s document retention policy. 20 Thus, the Court will set a further conference on June 17, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. In advance of that 21 conference, the defense will conduct additional investigation and will complete other tasks. The 22 Court ORDERS: 23 1. 24 25 26 No later than June 13, 2019, the defense SHALL: a. Provide a list to plaintiff’s counsel, by referencing the Bates number, of the documents that respond to each category of request; b. Contact the successor entity to AFC (the contractor it hired to design the 27 accused tanks) to determine whether it has retained responsive documents, including those held 28 electronically. The defense SHALL request informal production of these records and request that 1 1 production occur immediately; 2 c. Have communication with the IT staff of BakerCorp to determine: i. 3 Whether the legacy computer system can be searched, and 4 documents/emails recovered for the relevant period, which the Court understands is November 2012 5 through July 2013. If BakerCorp indicates that the system cannot be searched, the defense SHALL 6 obtain an in-depth explanation; ii. 7 Whether any of the records BakerCorp maintains electronically, 8 whether in the nature of accounting, financial, marketing or other category of data, can be searched— 9 and as necessary correlated with other data, to discover the persons/entities who leased any of the 10 accused tanks and the amount the person/entity paid for the lease of the tanks; d. 11 Investigate to determine whether it is wieldy to access the hardcopy version 12 of the pertinent rental agreements maintained in the defendant’s warehouse. If the relevant rental 13 agreements cannot be easily identified, the defense counsel SHALL determine the number of 14 hardcopy lease agreements which would need to be searched to discover the responsive documents. 15 2. The Court sets a further informal conference re: discovery dispute on June 17, 2019 16 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel will appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering access 17 code 1652736. No later than 8 a.m. on June 17, 2019, counsel SHALL lodge reports via email to 18 JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, indicating the status of the dispute and the extent to which they 19 believe the dispute has been resolved. 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 7, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?