Torres v. Patel et al

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER DENYING 34 Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/4/2020. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MIGUEL TORRES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
ISMAIL PATEL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00188-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
(ECF Nos. 34, 41)

16
Plaintiff Miguel Torres is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

17
18

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 25, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and

20
21

recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and a

22

preliminary injunction be denied. (ECF No. 41.) The findings and recommendation were served

23

on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one

24

(21) days after service. (Id. at 7.) No objections have been filed and the time in which to do so

25

has now passed.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

2

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

3

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

6
7

are adopted in full;
2.

8
9

The findings and recommendation issued on November 25, 2019, (ECF No. 41),

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction,
(ECF No. 34), is DENIED; and

3.

10

This action is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

January 4, 2020

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2