Ruby v. Matevovsian
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/4/19. Responses due by 2/11/2019. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVE RUBY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
WARDEN A. MATEVOVSIAN,
15
Defendant.
16
[ECF No. 21]
Currently before the Court is Defendant’s second motion for an extension of time to file a
responsive pleading, filed January 4, 2019.
Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant
21
22
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2674.
19
20
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00200-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Steve Ruby is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under the
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
shall file a responsive pleading on or before February 11, 2019.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
26
January 4, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?