Ruby v. Matevovsian

Filing 24

ORDER Granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/4/19. Responses due by 2/11/2019. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVE RUBY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. WARDEN A. MATEVOVSIAN, 15 Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 21] Currently before the Court is Defendant’s second motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, filed January 4, 2019. Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant 21 22 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2674. 19 20 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00200-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Steve Ruby is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under the 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) shall file a responsive pleading on or before February 11, 2019. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: 26 January 4, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?