Barbour v. United States of America
Filing
43
ORDER DIRECTING Defendant United States of America to File Responsive Pleading; Twenty-One (21) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/21/2021. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT BARBOUR,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 1:18-cv-00246-NONE-BAM (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Scott Barbour (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b).
On September 2, 2020, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant United
20
States of America’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 33.) Accordingly, on September 3, 2020, the
21
Court directed Defendant to file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s first
22
amended complaint. (ECF No. 34.) Following the filing of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration
23
of the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court
24
vacated the deadline to file a responsive pleading until after resolution of the motion for
25
reconsideration. (ECF Nos. 35, 37.)
26
On January 20, 2021, the District Judge denied Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration.
27
(ECF No. 42.) This action proceeds against Defendant United States of America only on
28
Plaintiff’s claim for failure to patrol. (Id.)
1
1
2
Accordingly, Defendant shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s
first amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 21, 2021
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?