Rodriguez ,et al. v. M. J. Brothers, Inc., et al.

Filing 10

ORDER RE STIPULATION CONCERNING DISCOVERY, STAY OF THE ACTION, AND MEDIATION. ORDER CONTINUING Scheduling Conference from May 15, 2018 to 10/11/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/9/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:18-cv-00252-LJO-SAB ORDER RE STIPULATION CONCERNING DISCOVERY, STAY OF THE ACTION, AND MEDIATION v. M.J. BROTHERS, INC., et al., ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO OCTOBER 11, 2018, AT 10:00 A.M. Defendants. 15 (ECF No. 9) 16 17 18 The parties to this action filed a Stipulation Concerning Discovery, Say of the Action, 19 and Mediation (“Stipulation”) May 8, 2018. (ECF No. 9.) 20 According to the Stipulation, the parties have scheduled a private mediation for 21 September 18, 2018. To facilitate the mediation and to reduce legal expenses pending the 22 mediation, the parties, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order, jointly move for an order 23 requiring (1) an agreed-upon method for Defendants to produce documents and information to 24 Plaintiffs’ counsel; and (2) a stay of all other litigation in this case, including but not limited to 25 discovery. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 Subject to the conditions set forth in this Order, this matter is STAYED until October 2, 2018. The parties shall advise the Court as to the status of this matter 1 1 by filing a joint status report on or before September 25, 2018. If the matter is 2 resolved, the parties shall file a notice of settlement. 3 2. The joint scheduling conference set for May 15, 2018, is continued to October 4 11, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. The parties shall file a joint report that 5 sets forth new dates at least seven days prior to the scheduling conference. 6 However, as the parties have already filed a scheduling report, the parties do not 7 need to include any other information besides the updated dates. 8 3. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and this Order, Defendants 9 agree to provide to Plaintiffs’ counsel, on or before June 15, 2018, complete, 10 legible, bates stamped copies of the following documents (with employee names 11 redacted, but including the last four digits of the employee’s social security 12 number on all of the records, including time cards, through pay period ending on 13 May 18, 2018) and data, in electronic form wherever possible, and/or in hard copy 14 when requested, the following documents for each Putative Class Member, as 15 defined in Plaintiffs’ Complaint: 16 a. All payroll records for each Putative Class Member; 17 b. All records of hours worked by each Putative Class Member; and 18 c. All employee handbooks and policies, of any kind or description, and all 19 draft versions thereof, in existence at any time within the past five (5) 20 years. 21 4. Nothing in this Order is intended to create, expand, limit or waive any of the 22 parties’ rights, defenses or remedies at law or equity. The parties reserve all 23 rights available to them under the law, including all statutes and constitutions; and 24 5. The parties have agreed to request that the Court equitably toll the statute of 25 limitations for the first cause of action, failure to pay overtime wages pursuant to 26 the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., for any individual who opts into any 27 collective action approved by the Court after the mediation. If the mediation does 28 not resolve the case, the tolling request would equal the number of days from May 2 1 8, 2018, until ninety (90) days after any order by the Court granting conditional 2 certification. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: May 9, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?