Rodriguez ,et al. v. M. J. Brothers, Inc., et al.

Filing 15

SCHEDULING ORDER RE CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION DEADLINE: Motion filing deadline 12/21/2018, Opposition deadline 1/25/2019, Reply deadline 2/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/1/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) Conditional Certification Deadline: Motion Filing: December 21, 2018 Opposition: January 25, 2019 Reply: February 8, 2019 v. 13 14 Case No. 1: 18-cv-00252-LJO-SAB M.J. BROTHERS, INC., et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 I. 18 The Scheduling Conference was held on October 1, 2018. 19 II. 20 Enrique Martinez telephonically appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. 21 Patrick Moody telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. 22 III. 23 Plaintiffs have consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. Defendants have not 24 filed a consent or decline form. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not 25 consented to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial, before United States 26 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, you should be informed that because of the pressing 27 workload of United States district judges and the priority of criminal cases under the United Date of Scheduling Conference Appearances of Counsel Consent to Magistrate Judge 28 1 1 States Constitution, you are encouraged to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in an effort to 2 have your case adjudicated in a timely and cost effective manner. Presently, when a civil trial is 3 set before Judge O'Neill, any criminal trial set which conflicts with the civil trial will take 4 priority, even if the civil trial was set first. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances 5 may no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause, but the civil trial 6 may instead trail from day to day or week to week until the completion of either the criminal case 7 or the older civil case. The parties are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline 8 magistrate jurisdiction without adverse substantive consequences. 9 IV. Conditional Certification 10 The parties have agreed to a phased approach to this action. This first phase shall relate to 11 conditional certification of an FLSA class. Any motions for conditional certification shall be 12 filed on or before December 21, 2018. Opposition to the motion for conditional certification 13 shall be filed on or before January 25, 2019. A reply, if any, shall be filed on or before 14 February 8, 2019. Hearing on the motion shall be set pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern 15 District of California before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. 16 V. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule 17 Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 18 moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five 19 (25) pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before 20 scheduling any motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230 21 and 251. 22 A. 23 Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before United States 24 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9. In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, 25 the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications for an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local 26 Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an Order Shortening Time, the Notice of 27 Motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 28 Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, providing a written 2 1 request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge’s Courtroom Clerk no later than three (3) 2 court days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to 3 appear by telephone, then it shall be the obligation of the moving party(ies) to arrange and 4 originate a conference call to the court. 5 Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the parties must 6 prepare and file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”) as required by 7 Local Rule 251. The Joint Statement must be filed seven (7) calendar days before the scheduled 8 hearing date. Courtesy copies of all motion-related documents, declarations, and exhibits must be 9 delivered to the Clerk’s Office by 10:00 a.m. on the fourth court day prior to the scheduled 10 hearing date. Motions will be removed from the court’s hearing calendar if the Joint Statement is 11 not timely filed or if courtesy copies are not timely delivered. In order to satisfy the meet and 12 confer requirement set forth in Local Rule 251(b), the parties must confer and talk to each other 13 in person, over the telephone or via video conferencing before the hearing about the discovery 14 dispute. The Court may issue sanctions against the moving party or the opposing party if either 15 party fails to meet and confer in good faith. 16 B. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 17 Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication: Prior to filing a motion for 18 summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in 19 person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. 20 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment 21 where a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has 22 merit in whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of 23 briefing; 4) narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement 24 before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a 25 Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 26 The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the Joint Statement of 27 Undisputed Facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall 28 file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 3 1 In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and 2 conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and 3 confer. 4 VI. 5 All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil 6 Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 7 amendments thereto. 8 efficiently handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the 9 Rules as provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the 10 Compliance with Federal Procedure The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to Eastern District of California. 11 Additional requirements and more detailed procedures for courtroom practice before 12 United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone can be found at the United States District Court 13 for the Eastern District of California’s website (www.caed.uscourts.gov) under Judges; United 14 States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone (SAB). 15 Procedures,” there is a link to “Standard Information.” All parties and counsel shall comply with 16 the guidelines set forth therein. In the area entitled “Case Management 17 VII. Effect of this Order 18 The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 19 most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. 20 If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel 21 are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either 22 by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. 23 Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless 24 they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached 25 exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. The parties are 26 advised that due to the impacted nature of civil cases on the district judges in the Eastern 27 District of California, Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored 28 and will not be granted absent good cause. 4 1 Lastly, should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to comply with the directions 2 as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including 3 monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed 4 and/or ordered. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 1, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?