Trotter v. Pfeiffer

Filing 31

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Two Unsigned 28 29 Motions to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/6/19. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES TROTTER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 1:18-cv-00259-BAM (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S TWO UNSIGNED MOTIONS TO COMPEL v. (ECF Nos. 28, 29) WARDEN PFEIFFER, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff James Trotter is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 17 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on April 25, 2019, and 19 20 Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on April 29, 2019. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) 21 However, both of Plaintiff’s motions to compel are not signed. Both Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 11(a) and this Court’s Local Rule 131(b) require that all pleadings and non-evidentiary 23 documents must be signed by the filing party, if the filing party is unrepresented by counsel. 24 Since Plaintiff is unrepresented by counsel and failed to sign either of his two motions to compel, 25 the Court must strike both of Plaintiff’s motions to compel from the record. 26 // 27 // 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, both of Plaintiff’s motions to compel, (ECF Nos. 28, 29), are STRICKEN from the record for lack of Plaintiff’s signature. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara May 6, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?