Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Pogue et al
Filing
2
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/28/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:18-cv-00271-LJO-BAM
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NANCY SVETICH POGUE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Brandon Alexander Favor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
20
jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all
21
defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which
22
a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part
23
of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an
24
action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any
25
defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. §
26
1391(b).
27
28
In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. Based on Plaintiff’s assertion
that the alleged violation occurred in Los Angeles, the court finds that the claim arose in Los
1
1
Angeles County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claim should
2
have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the
3
interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the
4
correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); King v. Russell, 963 F.2d 1301, 1304 (9th Cir. 1992).
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United
States District Court for the Central District of California.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 28, 2018
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A. McAuliffe
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?