Shepard v. Borum et al

Filing 51

ORDER GRANTING IN PART Defendants' Motion to modify Discovery and Scheduling Order 42 ; DENYING Plaintiff's Motions regarding case status and movement 43 , 47 signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/5/2020. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12

LAMONT SHEPARD,

13
14

v.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00277 DAD JDP
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER

15

ECF No. 42
M. BORUM, et al.,

16
17

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Defendants. MOTIONS REGARDING CASE STATUS
AND MOVEMENT

18

ECF Nos. 43, 47

19
20

Defendants’ motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order is granted in part. ECF

21

No. 42. For good cause shown it is hereby ordered that the dispositive motion deadline is

22

extended to May 15, 2020. No further extensions shall be granted absent extraordinary

23

circumstances.

24
25
26
27
28
1

1

Plaintiff’s motions regarding case status and movement, ECF Nos. 43, 47, are denied

2

because they are baseless. There were no additional motions or orders filed during the time

3

periods in question.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
Dated:
7

March 5, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9

No. 204.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2