Jaco v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 6/27/2018 and CONTINUING it to 8/29/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/11/2018. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335)
[e-mail]
Julie G. Yap (SBN 243450)
[e-mail]
Christopher J. Truxler (SBN 282354)
[e-mail]
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.

8
9
10
11
12

WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC
Robin G. Workman (SBN 145810)
[e-mail]
Rachel E. Davey (SBN 316096)
[e-mail]
177 Post Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94018
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all others
others similarly situated

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

SHIRLEY JACO on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. and Does 1
through 50, inclusive.
Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-CV-00301-DAD-EPG
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE
26(f) CONFERENCE & JUNE 27, 2018
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

Plaintiff SHIRLEY JACO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.

1
2

(“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys, pursuant to Eastern

3

District Local Rules 143 and 144, stipulate and agree that good cause exists to continue the Parties’ Rule

4

26(f) Conference and the Court’s Scheduling Conference set for June 27, 2018, to dates following an

5

order on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike:

6
7

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike
on March 9, 2018, which has been fully briefed by the Parties;
WHEREAS, the Honorable Dale A. Drozd heard oral argument on Defendant’s Motion To

8
9

Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike on May 1, 2015;

10

WHEREAS, the Court’s ruling on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The

11

Alternative, To Strike may impact the claims at issue in the litigation, the scope of discovery, and

12

scheduling of discovery and motions;

13

WHEREAS, in order to preserve time and resources, the Parties believe that their Rule 26 (f)

14

conference should be deferred until after the Court’s ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss

15

Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike;

16

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and agree to hold their Rule 26(f) conference within twenty-one

17

(21) days of the issuance of the Court’s Order ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or

18

In The Alternative, To Strike and to continue the Court’s Scheduling Conference.

19

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

2
1

1

DATED: June 11, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

2

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

3
By:
4
5
6

/s/ Julie G. Yap
Kristina M. Launey
Julie G. Yap
Christopher J. Truxler
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.

7
8
9

DATED: June 11, 2018

Respectfully submitted,
WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC

10
11

By:

12
13

/s/ Robin G. Workman
Robin G. Workman
Rachel E. Davey
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated

14
15

Attorney for Plaintiff agreed with the contents of
this document and authorized the filer to use her
electronic signature.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
1

1

ORDER
Pursuant to the above stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the Rule 26(f)

2
3

Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for June 27, 2018 is continued to August 29, 2018, at 10:00

4

AM.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

June 11, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
1