Jaco v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/15/2018 and CONTINUING it to 11/13/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/5/2018. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335) klauney@seyfarth.com Julie G. Yap (SBN 243450) jyap@seyfarth.com Christopher J. Truxler (SBN 282354) ctruxler@seyfarth.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 Attorneys for Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. 8 9 10 11 12 WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC Robin G. Workman (SBN 145810) robin@workmanlawpc.com Rachel E. Davey (SBN 316096) rachel@workmanlawpc.com 177 Post Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94018 Telephone: (415) 782-3660 Facsimile: (415) 788-1028 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all others others similarly situated 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 SHIRLEY JACO on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 23 24 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE & OCTOBER 15, 2018 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 21 22 Case No. 1:18-CV-00301-DAD-EPG v. WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Before the Hon. Erica P. Grosjean Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) & SCHEDULING CONFERENCES Plaintiff SHIRLEY JACO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. 1 2 (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys, pursuant to Eastern 3 District Local Rules 143 and 144, stipulate and agree that good cause exists to continue the Parties’ Rule 4 26(f) Conference and the Court’s Scheduling Conference set for October 15, 2018, to dates following an 5 order on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike: 6 7 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike on March 9, 2018, which has been fully briefed by the Parties; WHEREAS, the Honorable Dale A. Drozd heard oral argument on Defendant’s Motion To 8 9 Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike on May 1, 2015; 10 WHEREAS, the Court’s ruling on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The 11 Alternative, To Strike may impact the claims at issue in the litigation, the scope of discovery, and 12 scheduling of discovery and motions; WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ previous stipulation to continue the Rule 26(f) 13 14 Conference and the Court’s Scheduling Conference from June 27, 2018 to August 29, 2018; WHEREAS, the Court sua sponte continued the Rule 26(f) Conference and the Court’s 15 16 Scheduling Conference August 29, 2018 to October 15, 2018; 17 WHEREAS, in order to preserve time and resources, the Parties believe that their Rule 26(f) 18 conference should be deferred until after the Court’s ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss 19 Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike; 20 WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and agree to hold their Rule 26(f) conference within twenty-one 21 (21) days of the issuance of the Court’s Order ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or 22 In The Alternative, To Strike and to continue the Court’s Scheduling Conference. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 1 2 DATED: October 5, 2018 Respectfully submitted, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 3 4 By: 5 6 /s/ Christopher J. Truxler Kristina M. Launey Julie G. Yap Christopher J. Truxler Attorneys for Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. 7 8 9 DATED: October 5, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 10 WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Robin G. Workman Robin G. Workman Rachel E. Davey Attorneys for Plaintiff SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated 14 15 Attorney for Plaintiff agreed with the contents of this document and authorized the filer to use her electronic signature. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 1 ORDER After considering the above stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, the Court’s Scheduling 2 3 Conference currently set for October 15, 2018 is continued to November 13, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. The 4 Court grants telephonic appearances, with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following 5 dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file 6 a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the conference and to email a copy of same, in Word 7 format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 October 5, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?