Jaco v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/15/2018 and CONTINUING it to 11/13/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/5/2018. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335)
klauney@seyfarth.com
Julie G. Yap (SBN 243450)
jyap@seyfarth.com
Christopher J. Truxler (SBN 282354)
ctruxler@seyfarth.com
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone:
(916) 448-0159
Facsimile:
(916) 558-4839
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.
8
9
10
11
12
WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC
Robin G. Workman (SBN 145810)
robin@workmanlawpc.com
Rachel E. Davey (SBN 316096)
rachel@workmanlawpc.com
177 Post Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94018
Telephone:
(415) 782-3660
Facsimile:
(415) 788-1028
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all others
others similarly situated
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
SHIRLEY JACO on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated,
23
24
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f)
CONFERENCE & OCTOBER 15, 2018
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
21
22
Case No. 1:18-CV-00301-DAD-EPG
v.
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. and Does 1
through 50, inclusive.
Before the Hon. Erica P. Grosjean
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
1
SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) & SCHEDULING
CONFERENCES
Plaintiff SHIRLEY JACO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.
1
2
(“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys, pursuant to Eastern
3
District Local Rules 143 and 144, stipulate and agree that good cause exists to continue the Parties’ Rule
4
26(f) Conference and the Court’s Scheduling Conference set for October 15, 2018, to dates following an
5
order on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike:
6
7
WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike
on March 9, 2018, which has been fully briefed by the Parties;
WHEREAS, the Honorable Dale A. Drozd heard oral argument on Defendant’s Motion To
8
9
Dismiss Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike on May 1, 2015;
10
WHEREAS, the Court’s ruling on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or In The
11
Alternative, To Strike may impact the claims at issue in the litigation, the scope of discovery, and
12
scheduling of discovery and motions;
WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ previous stipulation to continue the Rule 26(f)
13
14
Conference and the Court’s Scheduling Conference from June 27, 2018 to August 29, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Court sua sponte continued the Rule 26(f) Conference and the Court’s
15
16
Scheduling Conference August 29, 2018 to October 15, 2018;
17
WHEREAS, in order to preserve time and resources, the Parties believe that their Rule 26(f)
18
conference should be deferred until after the Court’s ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss
19
Complaint, Or In The Alternative, To Strike;
20
WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate and agree to hold their Rule 26(f) conference within twenty-one
21
(21) days of the issuance of the Court’s Order ruling on the pending Motion To Dismiss Complaint, Or
22
In The Alternative, To Strike and to continue the Court’s Scheduling Conference.
23
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
1
2
DATED: October 5, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
3
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Christopher J. Truxler
Kristina M. Launey
Julie G. Yap
Christopher J. Truxler
Attorneys for Defendant
WINCO HOLDINGS, INC.
7
8
9
DATED: October 5, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
10
WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Robin G. Workman
Robin G. Workman
Rachel E. Davey
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHIRLEY JACO, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated
14
15
Attorney for Plaintiff agreed with the contents of
this document and authorized the filer to use her
electronic signature.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
1
ORDER
After considering the above stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, the Court’s Scheduling
2
3
Conference currently set for October 15, 2018 is continued to November 13, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. The
4
Court grants telephonic appearances, with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following
5
dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file
6
a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the conference and to email a copy of same, in Word
7
format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
10
October 5, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?