Raymond v. Martin
Filing
35
ORDER to the PLAINTIFF to File a Status Report, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/5/2018. Status Report due by 11/30/2018. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES RAYMOND,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00307 - DAD - JLT
ORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
STATUS REPORT
WARREN MARTIN,
Defendant.
15
16
17
The Court held the mandatory scheduling conference on November 5, 2018. (Doc. 34) Mr.
18
Raymond failed to appear at the hearing. However, the Court was provided by defense counsel, a letter
19
from Mr. Raymond’s doctor, dated November 1, 2018, in which the doctor reported that Mr. Raymond
20
was “under [the doctor’s] care,” and was “unable to travel at this time” to his hearing “in court in
21
Fresno, CA on November 5, 2018.” It appears that, for whatever reason, Mr. Raymond believed his
22
hearing was in Fresno; it was not. Thus, the letter fails to provide sufficient information for the Court
23
to understand Mr. Raymond’s plans related to this case, whether he is physically capable of proceeding
24
or, even, appearing in court in Bakersfield—his city of residence. Consequently, the Court ORDERS:
25
1.
No later than November 30, 2018, Mr. Raymond SHALL file a status report detailing
26
his intentions related to this case, including: 1.) whether he intends to prosecute this action; and, 2)
27
whether he is physically capable of proceeding in this action. If he is not physically capable of
28
proceeding at this time, he SHALL provide a confidential report from his doctor explaining his medical
1
1
condition, how it limits Mr. Raymond from participating in this action and the doctor’s opinion as to
2
when Mr. Raymond will be capable of proceeding in this action.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 5, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?