Laury v. Motl, et al.

Filing 13

ORDER DISCHARGING 10 Order to Show Cause why this action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute; Plaintiff's complaint will be screened in due course, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/30/2018. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DANIEL ALLEN LAURY,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00333-BAM (PC)
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

MOTL, et al.,
(ECF No. 10)

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff Daniel Allen Laury (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On April 2, 2018, the Court’s order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma

17

pauperis was returned as “Undeliverable, No Such Number” after being mailed to Plaintiff’s

18

address of record. Accordingly, on April 5, 2018, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to

19

file a notice of his current address or show cause in writing why this action should not be

20

dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 10.)

21

On April 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. (ECF No. 12.) Based on

22

Plaintiff’s notice, the order to show cause issued on April 5, 2018, (ECF No. 10), is HEREBY

23

DISCHARGED. Plaintiff’s complaint will be screened in due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

April 30, 2018

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1