Raul Gonzales, Jr. v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Filing
27
ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/13/2018. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAUL GONZALES, JR., an individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00345-LJO-JLT
ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC
CONFERENCE RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
(Doc. 26)
v.
TRANS UNION, LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
At the request of plaintiff’s counsel, the Court held an informal telephone conference related to
18
a discovery dispute. At the conference, it became clear that the attorneys have not yet exhausted their
19
meet and confer obligations. However, there were a few matters addressed. Therefore, the Court
20
ORDERS:
21
22
23
24
25
1.
No later than December 12, 2018, the defendant was to have provided the plaintiff’s
counsel a privilege log;
2.
No later than December 14, 2018, the defendant SHALL provide a draft protective
order to plaintiff’s counsel.
After the conference, the Court realized the plaintiff still has not lodged his settlement
26
conference statement. In addition, counsel both confirmed that they believed in good faith that the
27
settlement conference is likely to be productive and requested that it remain on calendar. Thus, the
28
Court further ORDERS:
1
1
1.
No later than December 14, 2018, the plaintiff SHALL lodge his settlement
2
conference statement as set forth and required by the scheduling order (Doc. 13 at 6-8). The plaintiff
3
SHALL attach all offers exchanged by the parties to his statement;
4
5
2.
The settlement conference will remain on calendar and counsel are relieved from filing a
joint statement as previously ordered on December 10, 2018 (Doc. 24).
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 13, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?