Raul Gonzales, Jr. v. Trans Union, LLC et al

Filing 27

ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/13/2018. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL GONZALES, JR., an individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00345-LJO-JLT ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE (Doc. 26) v. TRANS UNION, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 At the request of plaintiff’s counsel, the Court held an informal telephone conference related to 18 a discovery dispute. At the conference, it became clear that the attorneys have not yet exhausted their 19 meet and confer obligations. However, there were a few matters addressed. Therefore, the Court 20 ORDERS: 21 22 23 24 25 1. No later than December 12, 2018, the defendant was to have provided the plaintiff’s counsel a privilege log; 2. No later than December 14, 2018, the defendant SHALL provide a draft protective order to plaintiff’s counsel. After the conference, the Court realized the plaintiff still has not lodged his settlement 26 conference statement. In addition, counsel both confirmed that they believed in good faith that the 27 settlement conference is likely to be productive and requested that it remain on calendar. Thus, the 28 Court further ORDERS: 1 1 1. No later than December 14, 2018, the plaintiff SHALL lodge his settlement 2 conference statement as set forth and required by the scheduling order (Doc. 13 at 6-8). The plaintiff 3 SHALL attach all offers exchanged by the parties to his statement; 4 5 2. The settlement conference will remain on calendar and counsel are relieved from filing a joint statement as previously ordered on December 10, 2018 (Doc. 24). 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?