United States of America v. Dailey

Filing 8

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Close Case re 7 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/29/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:18-cv-00346-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 7)
MYSTI S DAILEY,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On March 28, 2018, petitioner filed a notice to dismiss this action without prejudice. (ECF

16

No. 7). In light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.

17

P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London,

18

62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the

19

plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

20

Accordingly, the hearing set for May 25, 2018 is VACATED, and the Clerk of the Court is

21

DIRECTED to close this case.

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25

Dated:

March 29, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1