J.I. v. United States of America et al

Filing 23

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Terminate Defendants Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 1, Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 2, Customs and Border Protection Officer Jacob, and Does 1-10 as Parties in This Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/29/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.I., Case No. 1:18-cv-00363-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, 16 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANTS UNKNOWN CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFICER 1, UNKNOWN CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFICER 2, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFICER JACOB, AND DOES 1-10 AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1) 17 (ECF No. 22) 12 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 18 19 This action was filed on March 15, 2018. On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of 20 voluntary dismissal without prejudice of Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 1, 21 Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 2, Customs and Border Protection Officer 22 Jacob, and Does 1-10 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 23 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 24 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” 25 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 26 (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has 27 held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet 28 to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th 1 1 Cir. 1993). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, 2 the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the 3 district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 4 F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is HEREBY ORDERED to terminate Defendants 5 6 Unknown Customs and Border Protection Officer 1, Unknown Customs and Border Protection 7 Officer 2, Customs and Border Protection Officer Jacob, and Does 1-10 as parties in this action. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: May 29, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?