J.I. v. United States of America et al

Filing 42

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES' MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 17, 2018. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 2 PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH (SBN 254934) Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Philip.Scarborough@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for the United States 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 J.I., CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00363-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE UNITED STATES, Defendant. 14 15 16 DATE: TIME: COURT: JUDGE: August 27, 2018 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 4, 7th Floor 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill 17 18 Plaintiff J.I. and defendant the United States jointly stipulate as follows. 19 On July 27, 2018, the United States filed a motion to change the venue of this action to the 20 United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. ECF 32. 21 On August 7, 2018, the Court stayed the limited discovery underway until the motion to transfer 22 was resolved. ECF 39. 23 On August 13, 2018, J.I. filed an opposition to the motion to change venue. ECF 40. 24 The United States’ reply in support of its motion to change venue is due on August 20, 2018. 25 The hearing on that motion is currently set for August 27, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. 26 The parties wish to discuss the possibility of a negotiated resolution to this litigation. Those 27 discussions will be aided by a short continuance of the briefing schedule and hearing date for the 28 30 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE 1 1 pending motion to change venue. Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate as follows and respectfully 2 request that the Court adopt the schedule proposed below. 3 Hearing on the United States’ motion to change venue (ECF 32) is continued to September 20, 4 2018, at 8:30 a.m. 5 The United States’ reply in support of its motion to change venue shall be filed on or before 6 September 13, 2018. 7 This continuance is made without prejudice to either party’s position on the pending motion to 8 change venue. 9 If the parties reach a negotiated resolution, they shall immediately file a notice to the Court 10 pursuant to Local Rule 160. Respectfully submitted, 11 12 Dated: August 17, 2018 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 13 14 By: /s/ Philip A. Scarborough PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States 15 16 17 Dated: August 17, 2018 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP 18 /s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles (as authorized on By: August 17, 2018) Jeffrey G. Knowles Attorneys for Plaintiff J.I. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE 2 1 2 ORDER The parties have jointly stipulated to continue the briefing schedule on the United States’ motion 3 to change venue (ECF 32) so they can undertake settlement discussions. Good cause for the requested 4 extension exists. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion to change venue (ECF 32) is continued to 5 6 September 20, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. The United States’ reply in support of its motion is due on September 13, 2018. This continuance shall be without prejudice to either party’s position with respect to the 7 motion to change venue. If the parties reach a negotiated resolution, they shall immediately file a notice 8 to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 160. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ August 17, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?