J.I. v. United States of America et al
Filing
42
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES' MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on August 17, 2018. (Munoz, I)
1 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
2 PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH (SBN 254934)
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
5 Philip.Scarborough@usdoj.gov
6 Attorneys for the United States
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
J.I.,
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00363-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO CHANGE
VENUE
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
14
15
16
DATE:
TIME:
COURT:
JUDGE:
August 27, 2018
8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4, 7th Floor
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
17
18
Plaintiff J.I. and defendant the United States jointly stipulate as follows.
19
On July 27, 2018, the United States filed a motion to change the venue of this action to the
20 United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. ECF 32.
21
On August 7, 2018, the Court stayed the limited discovery underway until the motion to transfer
22 was resolved. ECF 39.
23
On August 13, 2018, J.I. filed an opposition to the motion to change venue. ECF 40.
24
The United States’ reply in support of its motion to change venue is due on August 20, 2018.
25 The hearing on that motion is currently set for August 27, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.
26
The parties wish to discuss the possibility of a negotiated resolution to this litigation. Those
27 discussions will be aided by a short continuance of the briefing schedule and hearing date for the
28
30
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION
TO CHANGE VENUE
1
1 pending motion to change venue. Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate as follows and respectfully
2 request that the Court adopt the schedule proposed below.
3
Hearing on the United States’ motion to change venue (ECF 32) is continued to September 20,
4 2018, at 8:30 a.m.
5
The United States’ reply in support of its motion to change venue shall be filed on or before
6 September 13, 2018.
7
This continuance is made without prejudice to either party’s position on the pending motion to
8 change venue.
9
If the parties reach a negotiated resolution, they shall immediately file a notice to the Court
10 pursuant to Local Rule 160.
Respectfully submitted,
11
12
Dated: August 17, 2018
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
13
14
By: /s/ Philip A. Scarborough
PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
15
16
17
Dated: August 17, 2018
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
18
/s/ Jeffrey G. Knowles (as authorized on
By: August 17, 2018)
Jeffrey G. Knowles
Attorneys for Plaintiff J.I.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION
TO CHANGE VENUE
2
1
2
ORDER
The parties have jointly stipulated to continue the briefing schedule on the United States’ motion
3
to change venue (ECF 32) so they can undertake settlement discussions. Good cause for the requested
4
extension exists. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion to change venue (ECF 32) is continued to
5
6
September 20, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. The United States’ reply in support of its motion is due on September
13, 2018. This continuance shall be without prejudice to either party’s position with respect to the
7
motion to change venue. If the parties reach a negotiated resolution, they shall immediately file a notice
8
to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 160.
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
August 17, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON UNITED STATES’ MOTION
TO CHANGE VENUE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?