Washington v. Pfeiffer

Filing 14

ORDER Discharging 13 Order to Show Cause; ORDER Granting Second Extension of Time re 12 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/22/18. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRIS LAVALE WASHINGTON, 12 13 14 No. 1:18-cv-00368-SKO HC Petitioner, v. ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE C. PFEIFFER, Warden 15 Respondent. 16 ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 12) 17 18 19 20 Petitioner, Chris Lavale Washington, is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On May 18, 2018, the Court signed an order for Petitioner to show cause within fifteen days why he should not be sanctioned for failure to file 21 22 23 supplemental briefing on his motion to stay the case, as the Court directed on March 29, 2018. (See Doc. 5.) 24 In the intervening time between the Court signing the order to show cause and the 25 docketing of the order, Petitioner filed a second motion for extension of time to file supplemental 26 briefing. Petitioner declares that he requires additional time to prepare supplemental briefing due 27 to a breakdown in copying equipment. Petitioner has shown good cause for an extension of time. 28 1 1 The Court will not grant any further extensions of time for Petitioner to file supplemental 2 briefing. The Court cautions Petitioner that continued late filings may result in the imposition of 3 sanctions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local R. 110. 4 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS 5 1. The order to show cause issued May 18, 2018, (Doc. 12), be discharged. 6 2. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file his supplemental briefing by May 25, 2018. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: May 22, 2018 /s/ 11 Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?