Washington v. Pfeiffer
Filing
14
ORDER Discharging 13 Order to Show Cause; ORDER Granting Second Extension of Time re 12 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/22/18. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRIS LAVALE WASHINGTON,
12
13
14
No. 1:18-cv-00368-SKO HC
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER DISCHARGING
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
C. PFEIFFER, Warden
15
Respondent.
16
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 12)
17
18
19
20
Petitioner, Chris Lavale Washington, is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On May 18, 2018, the Court signed an order for
Petitioner to show cause within fifteen days why he should not be sanctioned for failure to file
21
22
23
supplemental briefing on his motion to stay the case, as the Court directed on March 29, 2018.
(See Doc. 5.)
24
In the intervening time between the Court signing the order to show cause and the
25
docketing of the order, Petitioner filed a second motion for extension of time to file supplemental
26
briefing. Petitioner declares that he requires additional time to prepare supplemental briefing due
27
to a breakdown in copying equipment. Petitioner has shown good cause for an extension of time.
28
1
1
The Court will not grant any further extensions of time for Petitioner to file supplemental
2
briefing. The Court cautions Petitioner that continued late filings may result in the imposition of
3
sanctions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local R. 110.
4
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS
5
1. The order to show cause issued May 18, 2018, (Doc. 12), be discharged.
6
2. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file his supplemental briefing by May 25, 2018.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
May 22, 2018
/s/
11
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?