Valdez v. Nielsen et al

Filing 14

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Respondent's 13 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/5/18. (30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SANTIAGO ESTRADA VALDEZ,

12

Petitioner,

13

v.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00398-JDP

14
15

KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, et al.,
Respondent.

(Doc. No. 13)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS

Pro se petitioner Santiago Estrada Valdez is proceeding on a petition for a writ of habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his immigration detention since July 4, 2017.
(Doc. No. 1, at 4.) The court screened the petition and directed respondent to file a response to
the petition. (Doc. No. 6, at 2.) Respondent moves to dismiss the petition as moot because
petitioner has been released on bond and is no longer in detention. (Doc. No. 13.)
The court will set a briefing schedule for respondent’s motion to dismiss.
Accordingly,
1. Petitioner must file and serve his response to respondent’s motion to dismiss within 30
days of the service of this order.

26
27
28
1

1

2. Respondent may file a reply in support of his motion within 15 days of the service of
petitioner’s response.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 5, 2018

/s/

6

Jeremy D. Peterson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2