Kern County Hospital Authority v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, et al.

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING 27 Stipulation to Amend the Case Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/10/2019. No later than 2/1/2019, plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default as to the newly added defendants or a notice of automatic stay unless the defendants have filed their responsive pleading. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KERN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, 12 13 14 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00473 DAD JLT Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 27) v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court granted the parties stipulation to amend the complaint to add new defendants on 18 October 3, 2018. Despite prompt service of the complaint, the plaintiff has allowed numerous 19 extensions of the responsive pleading such that it is not due on January 11, 2019 (Doc. 27-1 at 3), 20 the same day as the non-expert discovery deadline (Doc. 10). The plaintiff now reports that within 21 five days of service of the amended complaint, he learned that the two new defendants had filed 22 for bankruptcy, though, for unknown reasons, the plaintiff is unclear whether the automatic stay is 23 in place or, indeed, whether these defendants are proper parties to this action. (Doc. 27-1 at 3) 24 The stipulation notes that discovery from these two new defendants is essential but 25 provides little detail how discovery can be accomplished if, in fact, the stay is in effect. (Doc. 27-1 26 at 3-4) Thus, there is no showing that amending the case schedule can accomplish their discovery 27 goals. Moreover, there are too many unknowns and the need for the schedule amendment appears 28 1 1 to be based only on supposition, rather than any real investigation1. Consequently, the Court 2 ORDERS: 3 1. The stipulation to amend the case schedule is DENIED without prejudice; 4 2. No later than February 1, 2019, plaintiff SHALL file a request for entry of default 5 as to the newly added defendants2 or a notice of automatic stay UNLESS the defendants have filed 6 their responsive pleading3. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: January 10, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 For example, despite filing this action in February 2018 (Doc. 1-2 at 4) and despite the events at issue occurred in 2015 (Doc. 1-2 at 15), the plaintiff now reports there may be yet another defendant who should be added to this case (Doc. 27-1 at 3). 2 Though detailing many potential issues related to the new defendants, it appears the plaintiff has done virtually nothing to investigate, other than talk with the attorney for these defednants. Thus, before seeking entry of default, the plaintiff SHALL ensure it has named the proper parties in this action. 3 If the defendants appear, the Court will entertain a renewed stipulation to amend the case schedule. If they will not appear, the Court sees no cause to amend the case schedule, based upon the information currently before it. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?