Mann v. DHO ICE

Filing 10

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 06/18/18.(Supplemental Response: 8/10/2018) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
MANVIR SINGH MANN,

11

Case No. 1:18-cv-00485-EPG-HC

Petitioner,

12

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

v.

13

DHO ICE,

14

Respondent.

15
16

Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

17

18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 that challenges Petitioner’s prolonged detention and
19 requests the Court “to extradite me or to release me from detention on supervision as before until
1
20 my travel document[s] bec[o]me available for my extradition.” (ECF No. 1 at 8).

On June 8, 2018, Respondent filed a response to the petition. (ECF No. 8). As the

21

22 Department of Homeland Security has indicated that there is a likelihood of the issuance of a
23 travel document based on prior experience in other Indian travel document cases, Respondent
24 proposes filing a supplemental response within sixty days if no travel document has yet been
25 received. (ECF No. 8 at 3–4).
On June 5, 2018, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granted a motion for

26

27 class certification of 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) detainees in the Ninth Circuit and enjoined the
28

1

Page numbers refer to the ECF page numbers stamped at the top of the page.

1

1 government from detaining class members for more than 180 days without providing each a
2 bond hearing before an immigration judge as required by Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081
3 (9th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez v. Sessions, No. 3:18-cv-01869-JSC, 2018 WL 2688569 (N.D. Cal.
4 June 5, 2018).
5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1. On or before August 10, 2018, Respondent SHALL FILE a supplemental response with

7

any new information relevant to the obtainment of the travel document and that also

8

addresses the class action and injunction referenced above.

9
10

2. Petitioner may file a reply within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of
Respondent’s supplemental response.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 18, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2