Charles W. Cooley v. Indian River Transport Co.
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 06/07/18 GRANTING plaintiff Charles Cooley LEAVE TO AMEND to file his First Amended Complaint; defendant's responsive pleading is due 30 days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. The Amended Complaint (attached to 53 Proposed Stipulation and Order) is DEEMED filed as of the date of this Order. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DESAI LAW FIRM, P.C.
Aashish Y. Desai, Esq. (SBN 187394)
Adrianne De Castro, Esq. (SBN 238930)
3200 Bristol Street, Ste. 650
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (949) 614-5830
Facsimile: (949) 271-4190
aashish@desai-law.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RICHARD RAHM, Bar No. 130278
rrahm@littler.com
ALEXANDRA HEMENWAY, Bar No 297888
ahemenway@littler.com
333 Bush St., 34th Floor.
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.433.1940
Facsimile: 415.399.8490
BRITNEY N. TORRES, Bar No. 287019
btorres@littler.com
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814.4737
Telephone: 916.830.7211
Facsimile: 916.561.0828
Attorneys for Defendant
INDIAN RIVER TRANSPORT CO.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
CHARLES W. COOLEY on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
v.
INDIAN RIVER TRANSPORT CO., a
Florida Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
25 inclusive,
24
26
27
28
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
CASE NO.: 1:18−CV−00491−WBSBAM
Judge: William B. Shubb
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
)
)
) Complaint Filed: April 7, 2017
)
)
)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
WHEREAS on April 7, 2017, Plaintiff Charles Cooley (“Plaintiff”) filed his
2
Complaint for violations of the California Labor Code and Unfair Competition Law
3
against Indian River Transport Co. (“Defendant”).
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS Plaintiff seeks to file a First Amended Complaint, which adds
two proposed Class Representatives, Nicholas Marone and Grady Anderson.
WHEREAS a copy of Plaintiff’s proposed First Amended Complaint is
attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
WHEREAS Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff filing a First Amended
Complaint limited to adding the above proposed putative Class Representatives.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by
and through their respective counsel, that:
12
13
1. Defendant does not oppose the Court’s granting Plaintiff leave to file his
14
First Amended Complaint, which is limited to adding two proposed putative Class
15
Representatives, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
16
17
2. Defendant’s responsive pleading shall be due thirty (30) days after the
First Amended Complaint is filed.
18
ORDER
19
20
21
The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause
appearing therefore:
22
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Charles Cooley is granted leave to
24
amend to file his First Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as
25
Exhibit “A.”
26
27
28
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Defendant’s responsive pleading shall be due
thirty (30) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed.
1
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint is deemed
filed as of the date this Order is transmitted via the CM/ECF system.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 7, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?