Munoz Ferrer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/23/2020. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA, CSBN 223600
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8929
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
ISRAEL MUNOZ FERRER,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
17
ANDREW SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:18-cv-00494-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the
amount of SIX THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED, FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS
($6,715.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount
represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).
26
27
28
///
///
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1:18-cv-00494-GSA
1
1
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
2
the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Kelsey Brown, Mackenzie Legal,
3
PLLC. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the
4
assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United
5
States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered,
6
the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
7
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
8
that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to
9
be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments
10
made shall be delivered to counsel.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
11
12
attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the
13
EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and
14
bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel Kelsey Brown, including Mackenzie
15
Legal, PLLC, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1:18-cv-00494-GSA
2
1
2
This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel to seek Social Security Act
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
3
4
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 22, 2020
MACKENZIE LEGAL, PLLC
5
6
By: /s/ Kelsey Mackenzie Brown*
KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
[*As authorized by e-mail on Jan. 22, 2020]
7
8
9
10
Dated: January 23, 2020
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
11
12
13
14
By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
15
16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 23, 2020
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1:18-cv-00494-GSA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?