DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus et al

Filing 102

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/1/22 CONTINUING the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs' Oppositions to Defendants' FRCP12(b)(6) motions to dismiss: 4/11/22; Defendants' Replies (if any): 5/26/22; Hearing date: 6/16/22, at 2 p.m..(Kastilahn, A)

1 J. Gary Gwilliam, Esq. (State Bar No. 33430)
Randall E. Strauss, Esq. (State Bar No. 168363)
2 Jayme L. Walker, Esq. (State Bar No. 273159)
3 Angelina M. Austin, Esq. (SBN 336250)
GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI & BREWER
4 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1600
Oakland, CA 94612-3528
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6 Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8 ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON; GEORGIA DEFILIPPO; CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO; &
EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Professional Corporation
1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94612

GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

12 ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON AND
GEORGIA DEFILIPPO, as an individual
13 and as successor in interest to FRANK
14 CARSON,

Case No. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION
WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS

Plaintiffs,

15
16 vs.

Related to:
1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM (Athwal)
1:20-cv-00770-TLN-BAM (Wells/McFarlane)

17 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF
18 MODESTO, BIRGIT FLADAGER,
MARLISSA FERREIRA, DAVID HARRIS;
19 KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON, JON
EVERS, CORY BROWN, and DOES 1-25,
20 inclusive,
21

Defendants.

22
23

GEORGIA DEFILIPPO AND CHRISTINA
DEFILIPPO,

24
25

Plaintiffs,
vs.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00496-TLN-BAM

26
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.
27
28

JOINT STIP. AND ORDER TO CONT. OPP.
AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION
WITH DEFS’ MTDs

1

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01403-TLN-BAM

1
2

Defendants.
EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.,

3
4

Plaintiff,
vs.

5

Case No. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.
6
7
8

On November 13, 2020, the Honorable Judge Nunley consolidated this matter with
related cases DeFilippo, et al v. Stanislaus et al, USDC No. 1:18-cv-00496; Quintanar v.

10
Stanislaus, et al, USDC No. 1:18-cv-01403; Wells, et al v. Stanislau,s et al, USDC No. 1:20-cvATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Professional Corporation
1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94612

GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER

9

Defendants.

11
12

00770; and Athwal, et al v. Stanislaus et al USDC No. 1:15-cv-0031, for discovery purposes

13 (Docket #23 of Carson, et al.). The parties in these matters filed a stipulation and proposed
14 order continuing the respective opposition and reply dates in relation to the Defendants’
15 Motions to Dismiss, in related case Athwal et al v. Stanislaus et al, USDC No. 1:15-cv-0031
16
17

(Docket #175). That stipulation, attached here as Exhibit A, is a true and accurate copy of the
parties’ Joint Stipulation and Proposed order to continue dates in all of the related cases.

18
19
20 DATE: February 1, 2022

GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI & BREWER

21
/s/ Angelina M. Austin
J. Gary Gwilliam
Randall E. Strauss
Jayme L. Walker
Angelina m. Austin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FRANK CARSON

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIP. AND ORDER TO CONT.
OPP. AND REPLY DATES IN
CONNECTION WITH DEFS’ MTDs

2

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01403-TLN-BAM

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Professional Corporation
1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94612

GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER

9

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Exhibit A

26
27
28

JOINT STIP. AND ORDER TO CONT. OPP.
AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION
WITH DEFS’ MTDs

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01403-TLN-BAM

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)
[e-mail]
JESSICA L. GRANT (CA SBN 178138)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW A. CHIVVIS (CA SBN 251325)
[e-mail]
ROBERT S. SANDOVAL (CA SBN 311032)
[e-mail]
MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA (CA SBN 333222)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL, DALJIT ATWAL, WALTER W. WELLS
and SCOTT McFARLANE

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANILSAUS; CITY OF
TURLOCK; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF
CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; KIRK BUNCH;
JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE
LINGERFELT; STEVE JACOBSON; BIRGIT
FLADAGER; GALEN CARROLL;

20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26

WALTER W. WELLS and SCOTT
MCFARLANE

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND
REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION
WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Trial: None Set
Related to:
CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00770-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM
Case No. 1:20-cv-00770-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.
Defendants.

27
28

Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 2 of 6
1

FRANK CARSON,
Plaintiffs,

2
3
4
5
6
7

v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF
MODESTO, CITY OF CERES, BIRGIT
FLADAGER, MARLISSA FERREIRA, DAVID
HARRIS, KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON,
JON EVERS, CORY BROWN, and DEREK
PERRY, and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Defendants.

8
9

GEORGIA DEFILIPPO AND CHRISTINA
DEFILIPPO

10
11
12

15
16

Case No. 1:18-cv-00496-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.
Defendants.

13
14

Case No. 1:20-cv-00747-TLN-BAM

EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.,

Case No. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.

17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
2
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 3 of 6
1

Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF TURLOCK;

2

CITY OF CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY;

3

BIRGIT FLADAGER; MARLISSA FERREIRA; DAVID HARRIS; KIRK BUNCH; STEVE

4

JACOBSON; CORY BROWN; JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE LINGERFELT;

5

GALEN CARROL; FROLIAN MARISCAL; LLOYD MCKINNON; GREG JONES;

6

KENNETH BARRINGER; GALEN CARROLL; FRANK NAVARRO; and TIMOTHY REDD

7

(“Defendants”) and Plaintiffs ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON; GEORGIA DEFILIPPO;

8

CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO; EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.; BALJIT ATHWAL; DALJIT

9

ATHWAL; WALTER WELLS; and SCOTT MCFARLANE (“Plaintiffs”) through their

10

respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

11

1.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have been served with multiple separate motions to dismiss;

12

2.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs would like additional time to confer with Defendants and

13
14
15

possibly dismiss certain claims against certain Defendants;
3.

All parties agree that the deadline for opposing Defendants’ motions to dismiss be

continued to April 11, 2022;

16
17

4.

18

The stipulated briefing schedule is as follows:

19
20
21

Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed no later than May 26, 2022.

Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ FRCP
12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

April 11, 2022

Defendants’ Replies (if any)

May 26, 2022

Proposed hearing date

June 9, 2022 at 2 p.m.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
3
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 4 of 6
1
2

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 1, 2022

3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Arturo J. González
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL, DALJIT ATWAL,
WALTER WELLS, AND SCOTT
MCFARLANE

9
10
11

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ
JESSICA L. GRANT
MATTHEW CHIVVIS
ROBERT S. SANDOVAL
MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Dated: February 1, 2022

ALLEN, GLAESSNER,HAZELWOOD &
WERTH, LLP

12
13

By: */s/ Patrick Moriarty
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
PATRICK D. MORIARTY
JOHN B. ROBINSON

14
15

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MODESTO, JON EVERS, and
GALLEN CARROLL

16
17
18

Dated: February 1, 2022

19
20

GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI
&BREWER

By: */s/ Angelina Austin
J. Gary Gwilliam
Randall E. Strauss
Jayme L. Walker
Angelina M. Austin

21
22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON, GEORGIA
DEFILIPPO, CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO AND
EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
4
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 5 of 6
1

Dated: February 1, 2022

2
3

By: */s/ John Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet

4
5

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS
COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY, BIRGIT FLADAGER,
MARLISSA FERRIERA, DAVID HARRIS,
KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON, CORY
BROWN, DALE LINGERFELT, FROLIAN
MARISCAL, LLOYD MACKINNON, GREG
JONES, KENNETH BARRINGER

6
7
8
9
10

Dated: February 1, 2022

11
12

ARATA SWINGLE VAN EGMOND &
HEITLINGER

By: */s/ Bradley Swingle
Bradley J. Swingle

13
14

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF TURLOCK, CITY OF CERES,
FRANK NAVARRO, AND TIMOTHY
REDD

15
16
17

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

* Parties have consented to use of their electronic signature.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
5
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

Case 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Document 175 Filed 02/01/22 Page 6 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties:
The stipulated briefing schedule is as follows:
Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ FRCP
12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

April 11, 2022

Defendants’ Replies (if any)

May 26, 2022

Proposed hearing date

June 9, 2022 at 2 p.m.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ____________, 2022

10

By:

District Judge Troy L. Nunley

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
6
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM

sf-4684591

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties:

3 The briefing schedule is as follows:
4
5

Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ FRCP
12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

April 11, 2022

6

Defendants’ Replies (if any)

May 26, 2022

7

Hearing date

June 16, 2022, at 2 p.m.

8

10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Professional Corporation
1999 Harrison St., Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94612

GWILLIAM IVARY CHIOSSO CAVALLI & BREWER

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 Dated: February 1, 2022
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER TO CONT. OPP. AND
REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION
WITH DEFS’ MTDS

1

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01403-TLN-BAM