DeFilippo v. County of Stanislaus et al
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 10 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/1/2018. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 10), and good cause shown, the stipulation is granted. The time for the Stanislaus Defendants to respond to the complaint is extended to August 31, 2018. (Thorp, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, BIRGIT FLADAGER, MARLISSA
FERREIRA, KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON, DALE LINGERFELT, FROILAN MARISCAL,
LLYOD MACKINNON, CORY BROWN, GREG JONES and KENNETH BARRINGER
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
GEORGIA DEFILIPPO AND CHRISTINA
DEFILIPPO,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
13
14
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00496-AWI-EPG
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF
MODESTO, CITY OF TURLOCK, CITY
OF
CERES,
BIRGIT
FLADAGER,
MARLISSA FERREIRA, KIRK BUNCH,
STEVE
JACOBSON,
DALE
LINGERFELT, FROILAN MARISCAL,
LLOYD MACKINNON, JON EVERS,
DEREK PERRY, CORY BROWN, GREG
JONES, TIMOTHY REDD, KENNETH
BARRINGER, FRANK NAVARRO, and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Complaint Filed: 04/10/2018
(ECF No. 10)
22
23
Defendants.
24
25
Plaintiffs GEORGIA DEFILIPPO and CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO (“Plaintiffs”), and
26
Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, BIRGIT FLADAGER, MARLISSA FERREIRA,
27
KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON, DALE LINGERFELT, FROILAN MARISCAL, LLYOD
28
MACKINNON,
CORY
BROWN,
GREG
1
JONES
and
KENNETH
BARRINGER
1
(“Stanislaus Defendants”) hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
2
1.
This action was filed on April 10, 2018.
3
2.
Plaintiffs filed a proof of service (ECF No. 9), which states the Stanislaus
4
5
Defendants were served on various dates.
3.
The Stanislaus Defendants desire to avoid duplicate filings as a result of having a
6
response to the complaint due on various dates, and consolidate the response for all Stanislaus
7
Defendants to a single date.
8
4.
In addition, this matter may be stayed due to a related criminal case involving some
9
of the same facts and witnesses as the present action is pending, which case will implicate and
10
hinder discovery in the present action. However, since not all parties have appeared, additional
11
time is necessary.
12
5.
13
14
Accordingly, Plaintiffs and the Stanislaus Defendants agree that the Stanislaus
Defendants shall have until August 31, 2018 to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: June 1, 2018
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
17
18
By /s/ John R. Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
Attorney for Stanislaus Defendants
19
20
21
22
Dated: June 1, 2018
GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI & BREWER
23
24
25
By /s/ Robert J. Schwartz (authorized on 6/1/18)
Robert J. Schwartz
J. Gary Gwilliam
Attorney for Plaintiffs
26
27
28
2
1
2
ORDER
3
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 10), and good cause shown, the stipulation is
4
granted. The time for the Stanislaus Defendants to respond to the complaint is extended to August
5
31, 2018.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 1, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?