Renteria v. Matharu et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 16 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/14/2018. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LUIS RENTERIA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

1:18-cv-00497-LJO-GSA-PC

vs.
KABIR MATHARU, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 17.)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(ECF No. 16.)

17
18
19

Luis Renteria (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

20

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

21

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22

On June 27, 2018, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

23

plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on June 8, 2018, be denied. (ECF No.

24

17.)

25

recommendations.

26

recommendations upon Plaintiff at his new address, which allowed Plaintiff fourteen more days

27

in which to file objections. (ECF No. 20.) The time for filing objections has now expired, and

28

Plaintiff has not filed objections or responded otherwise to the findings and recommendations.

Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and
(Id.)

On August 2, 2018, the court re-served the findings and

1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

2

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

3

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

5

1.

6
7

The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 27,
2018, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2.

8

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on June 8, 2018, is
DENIED.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

September 14, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2