Gonzales v. Matevousian
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:18-cv-0621 KJN) to Fresno (1:18-cv-0499 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/12/2018. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT GONZALES,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-0651 KJN
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges that the Bureau of Prisons
19
wrongly denied his Case Manager’s request that he be placed in a Residential Reentry Center for
20
one year. In this claim, petitioner challenges the execution of his sentence.
21
Petitioner is housed in Atwater U.S. Penitentiary in Merced County, which is part of the
22
Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See
23
Local Rule 120(d).
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
25
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
26
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. See
27
Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 864 (9th Cir. 2000) (“petitions that challenge the manner,
28
location, or conditions of a sentence’s execution must be brought pursuant to § 2241 in the
1
1
custodial court.”)
2
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
4
5
6
California sitting in Fresno; and
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
7
8
9
Dated: April 12, 2018
10
11
12
gonz0651.109
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?