City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Filing
22
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 30, 2018 scheduling order (ECF No. 16) is amended as follows: Expert Disclosure Deadline: September 16, 2019; Supplem ental Expert Disclosure Deadline: October 14, 2019; Expert Discovery Deadline: November 18, 2019; All other dates and aspects of the August 30, 2018 scheduling order shall remain in effect, including the dispositive motion deadline of October 13, 201 9; and the parties are advised that no further modifications to the scheduling order will be granted absent a showing of good cause. However, the parties are free to contact Courtroom Clerk for an informal discussion with the Court should additional amendments to the scheduling order need to be made. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/25/2019. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CITY OF FRESNO,
Case No. 1:18-cv-00504-LJO-SAB
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
12
v.
(ECF No. 21)
13
14
15
TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
16
17
On August 30, 2018, the Court issued a scheduling order setting the trial date and
18 associated pretrial deadlines in this matter. (ECF No. 16.) On June 24, 2019, the parties filed a
19 stipulation requesting the Court’s approval of an agreement to extend the expert discovery
20 deadlines and the dispositive motion deadline in this matter. (ECF No. 24.) The Court shall
21 grant the proposed extensions to the expert discovery deadlines. However, given the limited
22 time between the proposed dispositive motion deadline and the currently set pretrial conference
23 and trial dates, the Court shall deny, without prejudice, the proposed extension of the dispositive
24 motion deadline. The Court reminds the parties of the following language contained in the
25 scheduling order:
26
27
28
Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be
considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and
where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting
the relief requested. The parties are advised that due to the impacted nature
of civil cases on the district judges in the Eastern District of California,
1
Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored and
will not be granted absent good cause.
1
2
3 (ECF No. 16 (emphasis in original).)
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 30,
4
5 2018 scheduling order (ECF No. 16) is amended as follows:
6
1.
Expert Disclosure Deadline: September 16, 2019;
7
2.
Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadline: October 14, 2019;
8
3.
Expert Discovery Deadline: November 18, 2019;
9
4.
All other dates and aspects of the August 30, 2018 scheduling order shall remain
in effect, including the dispositive motion deadline of October 13, 2019; and
10
5.
11
The parties are advised that no further modifications to the scheduling order will
12
be granted absent a showing of good cause. However, the parties are free to
13
contact Courtroom Clerk Mamie Hernandez for an informal discussion with the
14
Court should additional amendments to the scheduling order need to be made.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 Dated:
June 25, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?