Dillingham v. Emerson
Filing
67
ORDER Requiring Defendants Velasco, Martinez, Loftin, Emerson, Marsh, Wescoat, and Wilson to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/10/2020. Responsive Pleading due within 14 days. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JERRY DILLINGHAM,
12
13
14
Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS
VELASCO, MARTINEZ, LOFTIN,
EMERSON, MARSH, WESCOAT, AND
WILSON TO FILE A RESPONSIVE
PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
N. EMERSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
(ECF No. 66)
16
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 19, 2019, Defendants Velasco, Martinez, Loftin, Emerson, Marsh, Wescoat,
21
and Wilson filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim on the ground that they
22
are entitled to qualified immunity. (ECF No. 54.)
23
24
25
On February 20, 2020, the assigned District Judge denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
(ECF No. 66.)
Defendants’ responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint was due on or
26
before March 5, 2020. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A) (stating that the “responsive pleading must be
27
served within 14 days after notice of the court’s” denial of a Rule 12(b) motion). However,
28
Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed a
1
1
request for an extension of time to do so, or otherwise communicated with the Court.
2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of
3
service of this order, Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s second amended
4
complaint, (ECF No. 43).
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 10, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?