Dillingham v. Emerson

Filing 93

ORDER ADOPTING 90 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING 88 Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Administrative Relief, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/16/2020. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
JERRY DILLINGHAM,

Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC)

11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

N. EMERSON, et al.,
14

(ECF Nos. 88, 90)
Defendants.

15
16
Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

17
18

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 17, 2020, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and

20
21

recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for emergency administrative relief be

22

denied. (ECF No. 90.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and

23

contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after

24

service. (Id. at 3.) No objections were filed and the time to do so has expired.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

25
26

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

27

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 90) are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for emergency administrative relief (ECF No. 88) is denied.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 16, 2020
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2