Barefield v. HSBC Holdings, PLC et al

Filing 62

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/25/2019. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 3/25/2019. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 2/28/2019; Non-Expert 7/17/2019; Expert 9/11/2019. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 5/13/2019 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/25/2019; Hearing by 10/23/2019. Dispositive Motion Deadlin es: Filed by 9/25/2019; Hearing by 11/6/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 3/3/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DEBORAH BAREFIELD,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

HSBC HOLDINGS, PLC, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

Case No.: 1:18-cv-0527 LJO JLT

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 3/25/2019
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 2/28/2019
Non-Expert: 7/17/2019
Expert: 9/11/2019
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
5/13/2019 at 8:30 a.m.

16

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/25/2019
Hearing: 10/23/2019

17
18

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/25/2019
Hearing: 11/6/2019

19
20
21

Pre-Trial Conference:
1/2/2020 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

22
23

Trial: 3/3/2020 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 2 days

24
25
26

I.

January 25, 2019.

27
28

Date of Scheduling Conference

///
1

1

II.

Appearances

2

Plaintiff appeared in pro per.

3

Aaron Goldstein appeared on behalf of Defendants.

4

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

5

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

6

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

7

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

8

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

9

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

10

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

11
12

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

13

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

14

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

16

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

17
18

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

19

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

20

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

21

District of California.
The defense has indicated its consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the plaintiff is

22
23

directed to consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction to conduct all further proceedings,

24

including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, the parties SHALL file a consent/decline

25

form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating whether they will consent to the

26

jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

27

IV.

28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2

1

motion to amend, no later than March 25, 2019.

2

V.

3
4
5
6

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before February 28, 2019.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before July 17,
2019, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before September 11, 2019.

7

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before July 31, 2019,

8

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before August 21, 2019. The written designation of retained

9

and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C)

10

and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance

11

with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

12

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

13

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

14

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

15

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

16

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

17
18
19

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for May 13, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. before the

20

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

21

California. The parties SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

22

conference. The parties also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

23

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery the parties have completed and that which needs to be

24

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

25

order. Counsel and Ms. Barefield may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and

26

entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a

27

written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed

28

hearing date.
3

1

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

2
3

than September 25, 2019, and heard on or before October 23, 2019. Non-dispositive motions are

4

heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

5

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

6
7

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

8

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

9

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

10

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

11

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

12

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

13

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

14

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. The parties must comply with Local Rule

15

251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and

16

dropped from the Court’s calendar.

17

Counsel and Ms. Barefield may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by

18

dialing [phone] and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom

19

Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court

20

days before the noticed hearing date.

21

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than September 25, 2019, and heard no

22

later than November 6, 2019, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

23

United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, the parties shall comply with Fed. R.

24

Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

25

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

26

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

27

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

28

to be raised in the motion.
4

1

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

2

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

3

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

4

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

5

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

6
7

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

8

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

9

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

10

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion, the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and

11
12

conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

13

Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken.

14

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

15

January 2, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

16

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

17

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

18

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
The parties' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

19
20

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of the parties in preparing for the pre-trial

21

conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set

22

forth in the Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be

23

used by the Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

24

IX.

25

Trial Date1
March 3, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

26
27
28

The parties are advised that Judge O’Neill has announced that he will retire from the Court in January 2020.
Because the will not be completed before his retirement, after January 2020, the case will be reassigned but it is unlikely the
trial will occur until Judge O’Neill’s replacement is selected. In recent times, this process has taken up to three years to
occur.
1

5

1

States District Court Judge.

2

A.

This is a jury trial.

3

B.

Parties' Estimate of Trial Time: 2 days.

4

C.

The parties' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

5

California, Rule 285.

6

X.

If the parties believe the action is in a settlement posture and a conference with the Court would

7
8

Settlement Conference

be beneficial, the parties may file a joint written request for a settlement conference.
Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference will be

9
10

conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the Local Rule to be

11

appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management based upon the

12

location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a

13

different judicial officer, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than 60 days in

14

advance of the requested settlement conference to allow sufficient time for another judicial officer to

15

be assigned to handle the conference.

16

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

17

Techniques to Shorten Trial

18

Not applicable at this time.

19

XII.

There are no pending related matters.

20
21

Related Matters Pending

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure

22

All parties are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

23

the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments

24

thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently handle its

25

increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

26

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

27

///

28

///
6

1
2

XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and the parties as to the agenda

3

most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

4

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, they are ordered to

5

notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

6

subsequent status conference.

7

The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good

8

cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines

9

contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations,

10

and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief

11

requested.

12

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 25, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7