Richard S. Kindred v. Allenby et al
Filing
104
ORDER ADOPTING 102 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/13/2022. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:18-cv-00554-DAD-EPG (PC)
v.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
J. CORONA,
(Doc. Nos. 100, 102)
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Richard Scott Kindred is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
18
19
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United
20
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On March 16, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion requesting injunctive relief. (Doc. No. 100.)
22
Defendant did not file a response to plaintiff’s motion. On May 5, 2022, the assigned magistrate
23
judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion be denied.
24
(Doc. No. 102.) Those findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained
25
notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of
26
service. (Id. at 4.) To date, no objections have been filed with the court, and the time in which to
27
do so has since passed.
28
/////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this court has conducted a
2
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
3
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly,
5
1.
6
7
8
9
10
The findings and recommendations issued on May 4, 2022 (Doc. No. 102) are
adopted; and
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 100) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 13, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?