Richard S. Kindred v. Allenby et al

Filing 109

ORDER VACATING 105 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Serve a Copy of this Order on Richard Scott Kindred and on the Litigation Coordinator at Coalinga State Hospital, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/6/2022. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. ALLENBY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:18-cv-00554-ADA-EPG (PC) ORDER VACATING ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM (ECF No. 105) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED AND ON THE LITIGATION COORDINATOR AT COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL On September 1, 2022, the settlement conference judge, Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, 16 reset the date for the settlement conference scheduled on September 13, 2022, to January 12, 2023, at 17 10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 108). Therefore, the Court will vacate the order and writ of habeas corpus ad 18 testificandum issued on August 10, 2022. (ECF No. 105). The Court notes that it will issue an order 19 and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum with the new date approximately a month before the 20 continued settlement conference. 21 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. The order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued on August 10, 2022, which 23 directed the Executive Director to produce Richard Scott Kindred, # CO 000543-9, for 24 a settlement conference on September 13, 2022, is VACATED; and 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Richard Scott Kindred 1 via mail and on the litigation coordinator at Coalinga State Hospital via e-mail. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 September 6, 2022 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?