Richard S. Kindred v. Allenby et al
Filing
109
ORDER VACATING 105 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Serve a Copy of this Order on Richard Scott Kindred and on the Litigation Coordinator at Coalinga State Hospital, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/6/2022. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
ALLENBY, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:18-cv-00554-ADA-EPG (PC)
ORDER VACATING ORDER & WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
(ECF No. 105)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE A
COPY OF THIS ORDER ON RICHARD SCOTT
KINDRED AND ON THE LITIGATION
COORDINATOR AT COALINGA STATE
HOSPITAL
On September 1, 2022, the settlement conference judge, Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto,
16
reset the date for the settlement conference scheduled on September 13, 2022, to January 12, 2023, at
17
10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 108). Therefore, the Court will vacate the order and writ of habeas corpus ad
18
testificandum issued on August 10, 2022. (ECF No. 105). The Court notes that it will issue an order
19
and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum with the new date approximately a month before the
20
continued settlement conference.
21
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
22
1. The order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued on August 10, 2022, which
23
directed the Executive Director to produce Richard Scott Kindred, # CO 000543-9, for
24
a settlement conference on September 13, 2022, is VACATED; and
25
\\\
26
\\\
27
\\\
28
\\\
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Richard Scott Kindred
1
via mail and on the litigation coordinator at Coalinga State Hospital via e-mail.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
September 6, 2022
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?