Tracye B. Washington v. Stark et al

Filing 15

ORDER Adopting 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/4/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 E. STARK, et.al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00564-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF Nos. 7, 10] Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 16, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 21 Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. 22 The Findings and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were 23 to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on May 31, 2018 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 25 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, 26 the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 /// 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on May 16, 2018, is adopted in full; and 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order is denied. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ June 4, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?