Tracye B. Washington v. Stark et al

Filing 23

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Order Directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to Cease Deducting Filing Fees that are Duplicative, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/12/18. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 E. STARK, et.al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00564-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION TO CEASE DEDUCTING FILING FEES THAT ARE DUPLICATIVE [ECF No. 22] Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 On August 30, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a court order directing the California 17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to cease deducting the filing fees for case number 1:18- 18 cv-00609-JLT (PC), Washington v. Hicks, which he claims is duplicative of the instant action. To the 19 extent Plaintiff contends case number 1:18-cv-00609-JLT (PC), is duplicative of the instant action, 20 Plaintiff must seek relief in that action, and indeed a motion to dismiss that action is pending in that 21 action. (1:18-cv-00609-JLT (PC), ECF No. 10.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s instant motion is denied. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?