Tracye B. Washington v. Stark et al
Filing
28
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to File Amended Complaint Lodged on September 27, 2018 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/28/2018. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
E. STARK, et.al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00564-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED ON
SEPTEMBER 27, 2018
[ECF No. 27]
Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 26, 2018, the Court determined that this action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s original
19
20
complaint for excessive force claim against Defendants David Hicks and Hipolito Rocha, and all other
21
claims and Defendants were dismissed from the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.
22
(ECF No. 16.) On September 21, 2018, the Court granted Defendants Hicks and Rocha request to
23
extend the time to file a response which is currently due on or before October 8, 2018. (ECF No. 25.)
On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff submitted a first amended complaint which was lodged by
24
25
the Court. (ECF No. 27.)
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
At this stage of the proceedings, Plaintiff may amend his complaint once as a matter of course.
1
2
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). In addition, the Court has reviewed the first amended complaint and the
3
allegations are limited to the factual circumstances surrounding his claim of excessive force by
4
Defendants Hicks and Rocha.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s
5
6
first amended complaint lodged on September 27, 2018. (ECF No. 27.)
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
10
September 28, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?