Tracye B. Washington v. Stark et al

Filing 28

ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to File Amended Complaint Lodged on September 27, 2018 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/28/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 E. STARK, et.al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00564-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 [ECF No. 27] Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 26, 2018, the Court determined that this action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s original 19 20 complaint for excessive force claim against Defendants David Hicks and Hipolito Rocha, and all other 21 claims and Defendants were dismissed from the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. 22 (ECF No. 16.) On September 21, 2018, the Court granted Defendants Hicks and Rocha request to 23 extend the time to file a response which is currently due on or before October 8, 2018. (ECF No. 25.) On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff submitted a first amended complaint which was lodged by 24 25 the Court. (ECF No. 27.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 At this stage of the proceedings, Plaintiff may amend his complaint once as a matter of course. 1 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). In addition, the Court has reviewed the first amended complaint and the 3 allegations are limited to the factual circumstances surrounding his claim of excessive force by 4 Defendants Hicks and Rocha. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s 5 6 first amended complaint lodged on September 27, 2018. (ECF No. 27.) 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 September 28, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?