Juan C. Avalos v. Amazon.com, LLC et al
Filing
53
ORDER Regarding Stipulation to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 02/01/2019. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/12/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUAN C. AVALOS,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00567-DAD-BAM
)
) ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO
INITIAL
SCHEDULING
) CONTINUE
CONFERENCE
)
) (Doc. No. 52)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (Doc. No. 52) and in light of the Plaintiffs’ intent to
20
consolidate this matter with four other pending related actions before the Court, the parties’ continuing
21
efforts to meet and confer regarding a consolidated complaint, as well as Defendants’ motion to stay
22
currently pending before the Court, and for good cause appearing, the Initial Scheduling Conference
23
currently scheduled for February 7, 2019, is HEREBY CONTINUED to March 12, 2019 at 9:30 AM
24
in Courtroom 8 before Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report,
25
carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the
26
requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Doc. No. 26) one (1)
27
full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be emailed, in Word format, to
28
1
1
2
3
bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties may appear at the scheduling conference by telephone
with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748;
passcode 3190866.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 1, 2019
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?