Dillingham v. Garcia et al

Filing 114

ORDER Requiring Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Whether a Second Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/29/2020. Statement due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

JERRY DILLINGHAM,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

v.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET
AND CONFER REGARDING WHETHER A
SECOND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
WOULD BE BENEFICIAL

F. GARCIA,
Defendant.

13

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

14
15
16
17
18

The dispositive motion deadline has passed (see ECF Nos. 107 & 111) and neither party
has filed a dispositive motion.
Accordingly, the parties are directed to meet and confer regarding whether a second

19

settlement conference would be beneficial. In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak

20

and evolving coronavirus protocols, the parties may meet and confer by letter. Within thirty

21

days from the date of service of this order, Defendant shall file a statement with the Court

22

indicating whether the parties believe a second settlement conference would be beneficial.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 29, 2020

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1