Dillingham v. Garcia et al

Filing 133

ORDER GRANTING 132 Defendant's Motion for Clarification or, in the Alternative, to Vacate and Re-Set the Expert Disclosures Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/28/2020. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JERRY DILLINGHAM,

12
13

v.

14
15

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, TO VACATE AND
RE-SET THE EXPERT DISCLOSURES
DEADLINES

F. GARCIA,
(ECF No. 132)
Defendant.

16
17

Case No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC)

On October 27, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for clarification or, in the alternative, to

18

vacate and reset the deadlines for serving expert disclosures and rebuttal expert disclosures to the

19

extent they were not vacated by this Court’s order dated September 28, 2020. (ECF No. 132).

20

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. If necessary, after the

21

settlement conference the Court will reset the expert disclosure deadline and the rebuttal expert

22

disclosure deadline.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 28, 2020

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1