Dillingham v. Garcia et al
Filing
149
ORDER ADOPTING 143 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/9/2021. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JERRY DILLINGHAM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC)
v.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
F. GARCIA,
(Doc. Nos. 142, 143)
15
Defendant.
16
Jerry Dillingham (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
17
18
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed an emergency motion for administrative relief.
20
21
(Doc. No. 142.) On February 23, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
22
recommendations, recommending “that Plaintiff’s emergency motion for administrative relief
23
(ECF No. 142) be DENIED” because the relief requested is not related to the claim proceeding in
24
this case. (Doc. No. 143 at 3.)
Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
25
26
recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and plaintiff has not filed objections
27
or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.
28
/////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
2
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the
3
magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper
4
analysis.
5
Accordingly,
6
1.
7
8
9
10
The findings and recommendations issued on February 23, 2021, (Doc. No. 143),
are adopted in full; and
2.
Plaintiff’s emergency motion for administrative relief, (Doc. No. 142), is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 9, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?