Dillingham v. Garcia et al
Filing
57
ORDER Re: Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel for Settlement Purposes and for Confidential Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/10/19. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JERRY DILLINGHAM,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
F. GARCIA,
14
Case No. 1:18-cv-00579-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY FOR
SETTLEMENT PURPOSES AND FOR
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendant.
(ECF NO. 55)
15
16
17
18
19
Jerry Dillingham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se1 and in forma pauperis
with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 8, 2019, Plaintiff requested appointment of counsel for purposes of settlement and
20
for settlement negotiations to occur in a confidential setting without correctional officers
21
listening.2 (ECF No. 55).
22
23
24
25
As for Plaintiff’s request for counsel, it is denied because counsel has already been
appointed.
As to Plaintiff’s request for settlement negotiations to occur in a confidential setting
without correctional officers listening, Plaintiff will be transported to court for the settlement
26
27
28
1
Christian Pereira has been appointed as limited purpose counsel to assist Plaintiff with preparing for and
participating in a settlement conference. (ECF No. 51).
2
The request was forwarded to the Court on Plaintiff’s behalf by attorney Caitlin Henry due to Plaintiff’s
“disabilities and low reading and writing level.” However, Caitlin Henry has not entered an appearance in this case
and does not appear to represent Plaintiff. Nevertheless, the Court will address the request.
1
1
2
conference and the settlement conference will be off the record.3 It will be up to the judge
3
conducting the settlement conference to determine whether the correctional officers guarding
4
Plaintiff will be present during settlement discussions.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 10, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
However, if the case settles, the terms of the settlement will likely be placed on the record.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?